2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

c.a.

c.a.

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Trumps a shoo-in considering there's onlyonelikely (intelligent), candidate, thatmight, have a chance.
This is another wonderful example how pathetic the DNC has just become.
Somebody call thepound.

Everything You Missed From The 3rd Dem Debate
No time to watch the democratic National Debate? What this instead!
Carl

Carl

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Trump has a new ad..


And CNN refuses to run it.



That is savage, I love it. As it stands the democrats haven't a hope of pulling this election short of shenanigans of the most blatant kind, which would provoke a backlash so intense I doubt they would even go there. Trump campaign has shown they are fully prepared to bring certain dirty laundry to light (Biden) if it suits them, so would probably heavily publicize any evidence of rigging.

And realise that we are nearing the end of a full Trump term and the world hasn't imploded, nobody has been nuked, and generally the economy is doing pretty good and getting better. Who are practical people gonna vote for? Sure you can push people to get worked up about racism and other social issues, but in the end they will care most about putting food on the table.
Ennio

Ennio

SuperModerator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
图尔si Gabbard was so wonderfully outspoken at yesterday's DNC debates. Notice how many times she references the US's "regime change war" in Syria. She also hits back at theNew York Times和CNN涂片他们为她。图尔si shows some real honest to goodness guts and smarts. And that's why 'the swamp' will likely double down on their attacks of her, even if they'll all eventually be proven to be lies.


Last edited:
c.a.

c.a.

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Opinion:

Run Time 07:37 Oct 16, 2019
alkhemst

alkhemst

Dagobah Resident
Like her other 2020 debate appearances, Gabbard was the most searched for candidate:Gabbard, again most Googled candidate, slams 'despicable' CNN, NYT coverage of her Syria policy

Even though near the least time speaking time.


Maybe broadly people simply notice she speaks a very different narrative to the others? They want to find out what that's all about and it compels them to search for more?

Does this mean generally people's BS gauge isn't as bad as the propoganda makers are led to believe? Or would it follow that those propoganda makers are simply less competent in today's different context? I don't know to be honest. It's somewhat refreshing for me anyway.
SummerLite

SummerLite

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Does this mean generally people's BS gauge isn't as bad as the propoganda makers are led to believe?
I think moderate liberals looking for a sane choice would find Gabbard very appealing. I'm sure they're out there and the radical turn of the other Democratic candidates has left them without a choice.
Top Bottom