Archbishop Viganò Addresses the Catholic Identity Conference 2020 (Francis & the New World Order)

[drygol]

I am watching this vid and I am kinda surprised, well I am not surprised about their involvment. I am surprised that Archbishop is actually revealing it all about the Vatican helping globalists etc. now! :O
Has anyone seen this?

I wonder what are your thoughts.

[itellsya]

Interesting. Thanks for posting drygol.

Just to note for others, the transcript is available through Youtube for anyone who would prefer to read rather than watch - i tried to paste it into a quote box below but it wouldn't work, probably due to the length and formatting of the transcript.

Anyway, i wasn't familiar with him so i did a quick search and came across a few articles but i think wikipedia provides a good enough summary - some snippets below:

Carlo Maria Viganò(Italian pronunciation:[viganˈɔ]; born 16 January 1941) is anarchbishopof theCatholic Churchwho served as theApostolic Nuncio to the United Statesfrom 19 October 2011 to 12 April 2016.He previously served asSecretary-General of the Governorate of Vatican City Statefrom 16 July 2009 to 3 September 2011. He is best known for having occasioned two major Vatican scandals. These were theVatican leaks scandalof 2012, in which he revealed financial corruption in the Vatican, and a 2018 letter in which he accusedPope Francisand other Church leaders of covering up sexual abuse allegations against former cardinalTheodore McCarrick.[citation needed]

[...]

Comments on COVID-19 and Black Lives Matter

In May 2020, Viganò led an appeal criticizingrestrictions that were enacted during theCOVID-19 pandemicas being instituted for the purpose of "creating panic among the world's population with the sole aim of permanently imposing unacceptable forms of restriction on freedoms."It singles out the use ofcontact tracingdevices as well as mandatory vaccinations as infringements on people's rights and cites "growing doubts ... about the actual contagiousness, danger, and resistance of the virus." In addition to Viganò, purported signatories included cardinalsRobert Sarah,Gerhard Ludwig Müller, andJoseph Zen, BishopJoseph Strickland, and numerous other clergy as well as journalists. Sarah later said that, although he agreed with some of the views expressed in the letter, he did not sign it and asked to have his name withdrawn. Viganò insisted that he did sign it but agreed to remove his name.[111] [112]

On 7 June, Viganò released a 3-pageopen letterto PresidentDonald Trumpdescribing the pandemic and theGeorge Floyd protestsas a Biblical struggle between "the children of light and the children of darkness."He argues that the children of darkness are the "Invisible Enemy of all humanity." Moreover, Viganò argues thatriots are orchestrated by the children of darkness to serve the "purposes of those who would like to see someone elected in the upcoming presidential elections who embodies the goals of thedeep state."Viganò goes on to denounce Catholic bishops who expressed support for the protests, saying that they were "subservient to the deep state, to globalism, to aligned thought, to theNew World Orderwhich they invoke ever more frequently in the name of a 'universal brotherhood' which has nothing Christian about it, but which evokes theMasonicideals of those who want to dominate the world by driving God out of the courts, out of schools, out of families, and perhaps even out of churches."[113] The letter gained additional attention when President Trump tweeted a link to it, writing: "So honored by Archbishop Viganò’s incredible letter to me. I hope everyone, religious or not, reads it!" [114]

In response to the June 2020 letter and other statements, many Catholic leaders further distanced themselves from Viganò and his remarks, which the Catholic News Agency described as "apocalyptic claims about a looming spiritual battle and a globalist conspiracy pursuing a one-world government."[115] [116]

Statements regarding Vatican II

In June 2020, Viganò claimed that theSecond Vatican Councilushered in a schism where a false Church exists within the Catholic Church alongside what he considers to be the true Church."The errors of the post-conciliar period were containedin nucein the Conciliar Acts," he said.[117]Viganò criticized the interreligious activities of Pope John Paul II and especially of Pope Francis, seeking to link actions undertaken during their pontificates to what he perceived to be errors or ambiguities in the council. "If thepachamamacould be adored in a church, we owe it toDignitatis humanae[Vatican II’s Declaration on Religious Freedom]…. If theAbu Dhabi Declarationwas signed, we owe it toNostra aetate[Vatican II’s Declaration on non-Christian religions]," he said.[115]

Some of the points he's making remind me of what Malachi Martin was saying about the Catholic Church.

[anka]

Here's the transcript (copy/pasted to LibreOffice and from there here):

Dear friends,

Before beginning my talk, allow me to

extend my warm greetings to you all.

For the first time in more than two

years, I’m speaking personally to you

through this video message, which was

produced

a few days before the 2020 Catholic

Identity Conference.

As you can see, I am very well. My health

是优秀的, and I am even better in spirit.

This is also thanks to your prayers, to

the support

and the encouragement I receive from you,

and from so many friends and brothers

from all over the world.

Together, we are all united in prayer

and in the holy battle which we

are called to fight, each on his

respective front, all gathered

under the mantle of the Most Holy Virgin,

the Queen of Victories, and under the

protection

of St. Michael the Archangel.

I especially wish to thank Michael Matt,

who kindly invited me, with holy perseverance,

to speak to you. I believe

现在对我来说是一个有利时机

to deliver the following address.

The subject of my talk will be

“How the Revolution of Vatican II

serves the New World Order.”

WE LIVE IN EXTRAORDINARY TIMES

As each of us has probably understood,

we find ourselves in a historical moment

in time; events of the past,

which once seemed disconnected,

prove now to be unequivocally connected,

both in the principles that inspire them

and in the goals they seek to achieve.

公平和客观的看看当前

situation cannot

help but grasp the perfect coherence

between the evolution of the global

political framework

and the role that the Catholic Church

has assumed in the establishment

of the New World Order.

To be more precise, one should speak

about

the role of that apparent majority in

the Church,

which is actually small in number but

extremely powerful,

and which, for brevity’s sake,

I will summarize as the deep church.

Obviously, there are not two Churches,

something that would be impossible, blasphemous,

and heretical.

Nor has the one true Church of Christ today

failed in her mission, perverting

herself into a sect.

The Church of Christ has nothing to do

with those who, for the past 60 years,

have executed a plan to occupy her.

The overlap between the Catholic

Hierarchy

和深教会的成员

not a theological fact,

but rather a historical reality

that defies the usual categories

and, as such, must be analyzed.

We know that the New World Order project

consists in the establishment of

tyranny by Freemasonry:

it is a project that dates

back to the French Revolution, the Age of

the Enlightenment,

the end of the Catholic Monarchies,

and the declaration of war on the Church.

We can say that the New World Order

is the antithesis of Christian society,

it would be the realization of the

diabolic

Civitas Diaboli [the City of the Devil]

opposed to the Civitas Dei

[the City of God], in the eternal struggle

between the Light and Darkness,

Good and Evil, God and Satan.

In this struggle, Providence has placed

the Church of Christ, and in particular

the Supreme Pontiff, as kathèkon —

that is, the one who opposes the

manifestation of the mystery of iniquity

(2 Thess 2:6-7).

And Sacred Scripture warns us

that, at the manifestation of the Antichrist,

this obstacle – the kathèkon –

will have ceased to exist.

It seems quite evident to me

that the end of times are now

approaching before our eyes,

since the mystery of iniquity has spread

throughout the world

with the disappearance of the courageous opposition

of the kathèkon.

Let us not make the mistake

of presenting the current events as

“normal,”

judging what happens with the legal,

canonical, and sociological parameters

that such normality

would presuppose.

In extraordinary times —

and the present crisis in the Church is indeed

extraordinary — events go beyond the

ordinary

known to our fathers.

In extraordinary times, we can hear a Pope

deceive the faithful; see Princes of the Church

accused of crimes that in other times

would have aroused horror and been met

with severe punishment; witness

in our churches liturgical rites

that seem to have been invented by

Cranmer's perverse mind;

see Prelates process the unclean idol

of the pachamama into St. Peter’s

Basilica; and hear

the Vicar of Christ apologize

to the worshipers of that simulacrum

if a Catholic dares to throw it

into the Tiber.

In these extraordinary times,

we hear a conspirator —

Cardinal Godfried Danneels –

tell us that, since the death of John Paul II,

the Mafia of St. Gallen had been

plotting to elect

one of their own to Peter’s Chair,

which later turned out to be

Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

In the face of this disconcerting

revelation,

we might well be astonished that neither

Cardinals nor Bishops

expressed their indignation nor

asked that the truth be brought to light.

I will talk now about: THE ECLIPSE

OF THE TRUE CHURCH.

For 60 years, we have witnessed

the eclipse of the true Church by an

anti-church that has progressively

appropriated her name,

occupied the Roman Curia and her

Dicasteries,

Dioceses and Parishes, Seminaries

and Universities, Convents

and Monasteries.

The anti-church has usurped her authority,

and its ministers wear her sacred garments;

it uses her prestige and power

to appropriate her treasures, assets,

and finances.

Just as happens in nature,

this eclipse does not take

place all at once;

it passes from light to darkness

when a celestial body inserts itself

between the sun

and us. This

is a relatively slow

but inexorable process, in which the moon

of the anti-church

follows its orbit until it overlaps

the sun, generating

a cone of shadow that projects

over the earth. We now

find ourselves in this

doctrinal, moral, liturgical

and disciplinary cone of shadow.

It is not yet the total eclipse

that we will see at the end of time,

under the reign of the Antichrist.

But it is a partial eclipse,

which lets us see the luminous crown

of the sun encircling

the black disk of the moon.

The process that led

to today’s eclipse of the Church began

with Modernism,

without a doubt. The anti-church

followed its orbit despite the solemn

condemnations

of the Magisterium, which

in that phase shone with the splendor

of Truth. But with the Second Vatican

Council,

黑暗中of this spurious entity

came over the Church.

Initially it obscured only a small part,

but the darkness gradually increased.

Whoever then pointed to the sun,

deducing that the moon would certainly

obscure it,

was accused of being a “prophet of doom,”

with those forms of fanaticism and

intemperance

that arise from ignorance and

prejudice.

The case of Archbishop

Marcel Lefebvre and a few other Prelates

confirms, on the one hand,

the far-sightedness of these

shepherds and, on the other hand,

the disjointed reaction of their

adversaries

who, out of fear of losing power, used

all their authority to deny the evidence

and

kept hidden their own true intentions.

To continue the analogy:

we can say that, in the sky

of Faith, an eclipse is a rare

and extraordinary phenomenon.

But to deny that, during the eclipse,

darkness spreads — just because

this does not happen under ordinary

conditions —

is not a sign of faith in the indefectibility

of the Church, but rather

an obstinate denial of the evidence,

or bad faith.

The Holy Church, according

to Christ’s promises,

will never be overwhelmed by the gates

of hell,

but that does not mean that she will not be —

or is not already — overshadowed

by her infernal forgery

(i.e. the anti-church),

that moon which, not by chance,

we see under the feet of the Woman

in the Book of Revelation.

I quote: “A great sign appeared in heaven:

a woman clothed with the sun,

with the moon under her feet,

and on her head a crown of twelve stars” (Rev 12:1).

The moon lies under the feet of the Woman

who is above all mutability,

above all earthly corruption, above the

law

of fate and the kingdom of the spirit

of this world.

And this is because that Woman,

who is at once the image of Mary Most

Holy

and of the Church, is amicta sole,

clothed with the Sun of

Righteousness that is Christ,

“exempted from all demonic power

as she takes part in the mystery

of the immutability of Christ,”

as St. Ambrose wrote.

She remains unbruised, if not in her

militant kingdom,

certainly in the suffering one

in Purgatory and in the triumphant

one in Paradise.

St. Jerome, commenting on the words of

Scripture,

reminds us that “the gates of hell

are sins and vices,

especially the teachings of heretics.”

We know therefore that even the

“synthesis of all

heresies” represented by Modernism

and its updated conciliar version,

can never definitively obscure the

splendor of the Bride of Christ,

but only for the brief period of the eclipse

that Providence, in its infinite wisdom,

has allowed, to draw from it

a greater good.

THE ABANDONMENT OF THE SUPERNATURAL DIMENSION

In this talk, I wish especially to deal

with the relationship between the

revolution of Vatican II

and the establishment of the New World Order.

The focal element of this analysis consists

in highlighting the abandonment on the

part of the ecclesiastical hierarchy,

even at the top, of the supernatural

dimension of the Church and its

eschatological role.

With the Council, the Innovators

erased the divine origin of the Church

from their theological horizon,

creating an entity of human origin

similar to a philanthropic organization.

The first consequence of this

本体论subversion

was the necessary denial

基督的新娘不是

and cannot be, subject to change by those

who exercise

vicarious authority in the name of the

Lord.

She is neither the property of the Pope

nor

of the Bishops or theologians, and, as such,

any attempt at “Aggiornamento”

lowers her to the level

of a company that, in order

to garner profit, renews

its own commercial offer,

sells its leftover stock,

and follows the fashion of the moment.

The Church, on the other hand,

is a supernatural and divine reality:

she adapts the way she preaches the

Gospel to the nations,

but she can never change the content

by one iota (Mt 5:18),

nor deny her transcendent momentum by

lowering

herself to mere social service.

On the opposite side, the anti-church

proudly lays claim

to the right to perform a paradigm

shift not only by changing the way

doctrine is expounded, but the doctrine

itself.

Insisting on what the Magisterium

teaches

is useless. The Innovators’

brazen claim to have the right to change

the Faith

stubbornly follows the modernist

approach.

The Council’s first error consists

mainly in the lack of the transcendent

perspective —

the result of a spiritual crisis that

was

already latent — and the attempt to

establish

paradise on earth,

with a sterile human horizon.

in line with this approach,

Fratelli tutti sees the fulfillment

of an earthly utopia and social

redemption in human brotherhood,

in pax œcumenica between religions,

and in welcoming migrants.

THE SENSE OF INFERIORITY

AND INADEQUACY

As I have written on other occasions,

the revolutionary demands of the

Nouvelle Théologie

found fertile ground

in the Council Fathers

because of a serious inferiority complex

vis-a-vis

the world. There was a time,

in the postwar period,

when the revolution led by Free-

masonry in the civil,

political and cultural spheres,

breached the Catholic élite,

persuading it of its inadequacy

in the face of the epochal challenge

that is now inescapable.

Instead of

questioning themselves

and their faith, this élite –

bishops, theologians, intellectuals —

recklessly attributed responsibility for

the imminent failure of the Church

to her rock-solid hierarchical structure,

and to her monolithic doctrine and moral

teaching.

Looking at the defeat of the European

civilization that the Church had

helped to form, the élite

thought that the lack of agreement with

the world

was caused by the intransigence of the

papacy and the moral rigidity of priests

not wanting to come to terms with the

Zeitgeist,

and “open up.”

这西奥logical approach stems

from the false assumption

that, between the Church and the

contemporary world,

there can be an alliance, a consonance

of intent, a friendship.

Nothing could be further from the truth,

since there can be no respite in the

struggle

between God and Satan,

between Light and Darkness.

I quote from Genesis:

“I will put enmity between thee

and the woman, and between thy seed

and her seed; it shall bruise

thy head, and thou shalt bruise

his heel” (Gen. 3:15).

This is an enmity

willed by God Himself, which places

Mary Most Holy — and the Church —

as eternal enemies of the ancient

serpent.

The world has its own prince (Jn 12:31),

who is the “enemy” (Mt 13:28), a “murderer

from the beginning” (Jn 8:44)

and a “liar” (Jn 8:44).

Courting a pact of non-belligerence

with the world means coming to terms

with Satan. This overturns

and perverts the very essence of the

Church,

whose mission is to convert

as many souls to Christ for the greater

glory of God,

without ever laying down arms against

those

who want to attract them to themselves

and to damnation.

I will talk about the “IDEM SENTIRE”

OF REVOLUTION AND COUNCIL.

The Council Fathers’ sense of

inadequacy

was only increased by the work of

the Innovators,

whose theoretical ideas coincided

with the demands of the world.

A comparative analysis of modern thought

confirms the idem sentire [same feeling

or same mind] of the conspirators

with every element of the

revolutionary ideology.

I'll leave the description of these

comparative details

in the written version of my lecture.

When this anti-church

is fully established in the total

eclipse

of the Catholic Church, the authority

of its leaders (i.e. of the anti-church)

will depend on the degree of

subjugation to the New World Order,

which will not tolerate any divergence

from its own

creed and will

ruthlessly apply that dogmatism,

fanaticism and fundamentalism that many

Prelates

and self-styled intellectuals

criticize in those who remain faithful to

the Magisterium today.

In this way, the deep church

may continue to bear the trademark

“Catholic Church,” but it will be

the slave of the New Order thinking,

reminiscent of the Jews who, after

denying the Kingship of Christ

before Pilate, were enslaved

公民权力的时间:

“We have no other king but Caesar” (Jn 19:15).

Today’s Caesar commands us

to close the churches, wear a mask,

and suspend the celebrations under the

pretext of

a pseudo-pandemic.

The communist regime persecutes the

Chinese Catholics,

and the world hears nothing but silence

from Rome.

Tomorrow a new Titus will sack the

Council temple,

transporting its remains to some museum,

and divine vengeance at the hands of the

pagans

will have been achieved once again.

I will talk now about THE INSTRUMENTAL ROLE

OF THE MODERATE CATHOLICS IN THE REVOLUTION.

Some might say that the Council Fathers

and Popes

who presided over that

assembly,

没有意识到implications that

their approval

of the Vatican II documents would have

for the future of the Church.

If this were the case – i.e.,

if there had been any subsequent

regrets

in their hasty approval of

equivocal texts or texts close to heresy —

it is difficult to understand why they

were unable to put

an immediate stop to abuses,

correct errors, clarify misunderstandings

and omissions. And above all,

it is incomprehensible why the

ecclesiastical Authority has been

so ruthless against those who defended

the Catholic Truth,

and, at the same time, was so terribly

accommodating to rebels and heretics.

In any case, the responsibility for the

conciliar crisis

must be laid at the feet of the

Authority

which, even amid a thousand appeals to

collegiality

and pastoralism,

has jealously guarded

its prerogatives, exercising them

only in one direction,

也就是说,一个gainst the pusillus grex

[the little flock] and never against

the enemies of God and the Church.

The very rare exceptions,

when a heretic theologian

or revolutionary religious has been

censored by the Holy Office,

only offer tragic confirmation

of a rule that has been enforced for

decades;

not to mention that many of them,

in recent times, have been rehabilitated

without any abjuration of their errors

and even promoted to institutional

positions

in the Roman Curia or Pontifical

Athenaeums.

This is the reality that emerges from

what I have described above.

However, we know that,

in addition to the progressive wing of

the Council and

the traditional Catholic wing, there is a

part

of the Episcopate, the clergy, and the

people

that attempts to keep equal distance

from

what it considers two extremes.

I am talking about the so-called

“conservatives,”

也就是说,一个centrist part

of the ecclesial body that ends up

“carrying water”

for the Revolutionaries because,

while rejecting their excesses,

it shares the same principles.

The error of the “conservatives”

lies in giving a negative connotation

to traditionalism and in placing it

on the opposite side of progressivism.

Their aurea mediocritas [via media]

consists in arbitrarily placing

themselves

not between two vices,

but between virtue and vice.

They are the ones who criticize the

excesses

of the pachamama or the most extreme

of Bergoglio’s

statements, but who do

not tolerate the Council

being questioned, let alone

the intrinsic link between the conciliar

cancer

and the current metastasis.

The correlation between political

conservatism and religious

conservatism consists

in adopting the “center,” a synthesis

between the “right” thesis

and the “left” antithesis, according to the

Hegelian

approach so cherished by moderate

supporters of the Council.

Now we will talk about: “OPEN SOCIETY”

AND “OPEN RELIGION”

This analysis would hardly be complete

without a word

on the neo-language so popular in the

ecclesiastical sphere.

Traditional Catholic vocabulary has been

deliberately modified,

in order to change the content it

expresses.

The same has happened in the liturgy and

preaching,

where the clarity of the Catholic

exposition

has been replaced by ambiguity

or the implicit denial

of dogmatic truth. The examples

are endless. This phenomenon

also goes back to Vatican II,

which sought to develop “Catholic”

versions of the slogans of the world.

Nevertheless, I would like to emphasize

that

all those expressions that are borrowed

from secularistic lexicons

are also part of the neo-language.

Let us consider Bergoglio’s

insistence

on the “outgoing church,” of openness

as a positive value.

Similarly, I quote from Fratelli tutti:

“A living and dynamic people,

a people with a future, is one constantly

open to a new synthesis through

its ability to welcome differences”

(Fratelli tutti, n. 160).

I quote again: “The Church is a home

with open doors” (ibid. 276).

“We want to be a Church that serves,

that leaves home and goes forth from its

places of worship,

强暴的出去,

in order to accompany life, to sustain

hope, to be the sign of unity...

to build bridges, to break down walls,

to sow seeds of reconciliation” (ibid.).

Close quotation.

The similarity with the Open Society

sought after by Soros’

globalist ideology

is so striking as to almost constitute

an Open Religion counterpoint to it.

And this Open Religion is perfectly in

tune

with the intentions of globalism:

From the political meetings “for a New

Humanism”

blessed by the leaders of the church,

to the participation of the progressive

intelligentsia in green propaganda.

It all chases after the mainstream

thought,

in the sad and grotesque attempt to

please the world.

The stark contrast with the words of the

Apostle is clear.

I quote from the Epistle to the

Galatians:

“Am I now trying to win the approval of

human beings, or of God?

Or am I trying to please people?

If I were still trying to please people,

I would not be a servant of Christ” (Gal 1:10).

The Catholic Church lives

under the gaze of God;

she exists for His glory and for the

salvation of souls.

The anti-church lives under the gaze of

the world,

pandering to the blasphemous apotheosis

of man

and the damnation of souls.

During the last session of the Second

Vatican Ecumenical Council,

before all the Synod

Fathers, these astonishing words

of Paul VI resounded in the Vatican

Basilica.

I quote: “The religion of the God

who became man has met the religion

(for such it is) of man

who makes himself God.

And what happened? Was there a clash,

a battle, a condemnation?

There could have been, but there was

none.

The old story of the Samaritan

has been the model

of the spirituality of the Council.

A feeling of boundless sympathy

has permeated the whole of it.

the attention of our Council has been

absorbed by the discovery

of human needs (and these needs

grow in proportion to the greatness which

the son of the earth

claims for himself).

But we call upon those

who term themselves

modern humanists,

and who have renounced the

transcendent value

of the highest realities,

to give the Council credit at least for

one quality

and to recognize our own new type of

humanism:

we, too, in fact, we more than any others,

honor mankind.”

This sympathy

is the figure of the Council

and of the new religion (for such it is)

of the anti-church. An anti-church

born of the unclean union between the

Church

and the world, between the heavenly

Jerusalem and the hellish Babylon.

Note well: the first time

a Pontiff mentioned the “new

humanism”

was at the final session of Vatican II,

and today we find it repeated as a

mantra by those who consider it

a perfect and coherent expression

of the revolutionary mens [frame of mind]

of the Council.

Always in view of this communion of

intent between the New World Order and

the anti-church,

we must remember the Global Compact

on Education, a project designed by

Bergoglio and promoted in collaboration

with the United Nations, I quote:

“to generate a change on a planetary

scale,

so that education is a creator of

brotherhood,

peace and justice.

An even more urgent need

in this time marked by the pandemic.”

Close quote.

This project has been supported and

spread

to all educational institutions

by the Congregation for Catholic

Education

through a Letter that makes explicit

reference

to the conciliar Constitution Gaudium

et Spes.

The Global Compact on Education –

I quote – is a “process of formation

in the relationship and culture

of encounter [that] also finds space

and value in the ‘common home’

with all creatures, since people,

just as they are formed to the logic

of communion and solidarity,

are already working ‘to recover

serene harmony with creation,’

and to configure the world

as ‘a space of true brotherhood.’”

Close the quote.

As can be seen,

the ideological reference is always

and only to Vatican II,

because only from that moment on

did the anti-church put man in the

place of God,

the creature in the place

of the Creator.

The “new humanism” obviously

has an environmental and ecological

frame

into which are grafted both the encyclical

Laudato sì

and the green theology –

the “Church with an Amazonian face”

of the 2019 Synod of Bishops,

with its idolatrous worship of

pachamama

in the presence of the Roman

Sanhedrin.

The Church’s attitude during Covid-19

demonstrated, on the one hand, the

hierarchy’s submission

to the diktats of the State,

in violation of the Libertas Ecclesiae,

which the Pope should have firmly

defended.

It also put on display the denial of any

supernatural

meaning of the pandemic, replacing

the righteous wrath of God

offended by the countless sins of

humanity and nations

with the more disturbing and destructive

fury of Nature,

offended by the lack of respect

for the environment.

I would like to emphasize that

attributing

自然的人格同一性,

almost endowed with intellect

and will, is a prelude

to her divinization.

We have already seen a sacrilegious prelude

to this, under the very dome of St.

Peter’s Basilica.

The bottom line is this: conformity on

the part of the

anti-church with the dominant ideology

of the modern world

establishes a real cooperation

with powerful representatives of the deep

state,

starting with those working towards

a “sustainable economy” involving

Jorge Mario Bergoglio, Bill Gates,

Jeffrey Sachs, and John Elkann,

to mention a few.

Allow me a brief word about the political situation

in the United States

on the eve of the presidential election.

Fratelli tutti seems to be a form of

Vatican endorsement

of the Democratic candidate, in clear

opposition to Donald Trump,

and came a few days after Francis refused

to grant an audience to Secretary of State

Mike Pompeo in Rome. This confirms

which side the children of light are on,

and who the children of darkness are.

I will talk out about THE IDEOLOGICAL

FOUNDATIONS

OF “BROTHERHOOD.”

The theme of brotherhood,

an obsession for Bergoglio, finds

its first formulation in Nostra aetate

and Dignitatis humanae.

The latest Encyclical, Fratelli tutti,

is the manifesto of this Masonic vision,

in which the cry Liberté,

Égalité, Fraternité replaced

the Gospel, for the sake of a unity among

men

that leaves out God.

Note that the Document on Human Fraternity

for World Peace and Living Together,

signed in Abu Dhabi on February 4,

2019, was proudly defended by Bergoglio

with these words. I quote:

“From the Catholic point of view

the document did not go one millimeter beyond

the Second Vatican Council.”

I close the quote.

Cardinal Miguel Ayuso Guixot, President

of the Pontifical Council for

Interreligious Dialogue,

comments in La Civiltà Cattolica —

I quote:

“The Catholic Church’s commitment to inter-

religious dialogue,

which opens the way to peace and fraternity,

is part of her religious mission

and at its roots in the Council event.”

I close the quote. Once again,

the cancer of Vatican II confirms

that it is at the origin of the Bergoglian

metastasis.

The fil rouge [common thread]

that unites the Council with the cult of

the pachamama

also passes through Assisi, as my brother

Athanasius Schneider rightly

pointed out in his recent speech.

And speaking of the anti-church,

Archbishop Fulton Sheen

描述了基督— I quote:

“Since his religion will be brotherhood

without the paternity of God, he will deceive

even the elect.” Close the quote.

We seem to see the prophecy

of the venerable American Archbishop

coming true

before our eyes.

It is no surprise, therefore, that the infamous

Grand Lodge of Spain,

after having warmly congratulated its

paladin raised

to the Throne, has once again

paid homage to Bergoglio with these words —

I quote: “Pope Francis’

latest encyclical shows how

far the present Catholic Church

is from its previous positions.

In Fratelli Tutti, the pope embraced

the Universal Brotherhood, the great principle

of modern Freemasonry.”

Close quote.

The reaction of the Grand Oriente of Italy

is not dissimilar. I quote:

“These are the principles that Freemasonry

has always pursued and guarded

for the elevation of Humanity.”

Close quote.

I remember that in the masonic documents

of the Alta Vendita, since the 19th

世纪,一个渗透

of Freemasonry into the Church was planned.

I quote: “You, too,

will fish some friends and lead them

to the feet of the Apostolic See.

You will have preached revolution

in Tiara and Cope,

proceeded under the cross and banner,

a revolution that will need only a little help

to set the quarters of the world on fire.”

I will talk now about CAUSE AND EFFECT.

Philosophy teaches us that to a cause

always correspond a certain effect.

We have seen that the actions carried out

during Vatican II

have had the desired effect,

giving concrete form to that

anthropological turning point

which today has led

to the apostasy of the anti-church and

the eclipse of the true Church of

Christ. We must therefore

understand that, if we want to undo

the harmful effects we see before us,

it is necessary and indispensable to

remove the factors

导致他们。如果这是我们的目标,

it is clear that accepting — or even

partially accepting — those revolutionary principles

would make our effort useless

and counterproductive.

We must therefore be clear about the objectives

to be achieved, ordering our

actions to the goals.

But we must all be aware that in this work of

restoration no exceptions

to the principles are possible,

precisely because failure to share them

would prevent any chance of success.

Therefore, let us put aside,

once and for all, the

vain distinctions concerning the presumed

goodness of the Council, the betrayal

of the will of the Synod Fathers,

the letter and spirit of Vatican II,

the magisterial weight (or lack thereof)

of its acts,

and the hermeneutic of continuity versus

that of rapture.

The anti-church has used

“Ecumeni这个标签cal Council”

to give authority and legal force to its

revolutionary agenda,

just as Bergoglio calls his political

manifesto of allegiance

to the New World Order an “encyclical letter.”

The cunning of the enemy has isolated the

healthy part of the Church,

torn between having to recognize

the subversive nature of the Council documents,

thus having to exclude them

from the Magisterial corpus, and

having to deny reality by declaring them

apodictically orthodox in order

to safeguard the infallibility

of the Magisterium.

The Dubia represented

a humiliation of those Princes of the Church,

but without untying the doctrinal knots

brought to the attention of the Roman Pontiff.

Bergoglio does not respond, precisely because

he does not want to deny or confirm

the implied errors, thus exposing himself

to the risk of being declared a

heretic and losing the papacy.

This is the same method used with

the Council, where ambiguity

and the use of imprecise terminology

prevent the condemnation of the error

that has been implied. But the jurist

knows very well that, in addition

to the blatant violation of the law,

one can also commit a crime by

circumventing it, using it

for evil purposes:

contra legem fit, quod in fraudem legis fit.

The latin says: what circumvents

the law is against it.

To conclude: The only way to win this battle is to go back

to doing what the Church has always done,

and to stop doing what the anti-church asks of us

today — that which the true Church

has always condemned.

Let us put Our Lord Jesus Christ, King

and High Priest,

back at the center of the life of the Church;

and before that, at the center of the life

of our communities, of our families,

of ourselves. Let us restore

the crown to Our Lady, Mary Most Holy,

Queen and Mother of the Church.

Let us return to celebrate the

traditional Holy Liturgy

worthily, and to pray with the words of

the Saints,

not with the ramblings of the modernists

and heretics.

Let us begin again to savor

the writings of the Fathers of the

Church and the Mystics,

and to throw into the fire the works imbued

with modernism

and immanentist sentimentalism.

Let us support, with prayer

and material help, the good priests who

remain faithful to the true Faith,

and withdraw all support from those who

have come to terms with the world and its lies.

And above all — I ask you in the name of God —

let us abandon that sense of inferiority

that our adversaries have accustomed us

to accept:

in the Lord’s war, they do not humiliate

us (we certainly deserve every

humiliation for our sins).

No, they humiliate the Majesty of God

and the Bride of the Immaculate Lamb.

The Truth that we embrace does not come from us,

but from God! To let Truth be denied,

or to accept that it must justify

itself before the heresies and errors of

the anti-church,

is not an act of humility,

but of cowardice and pusillanimity.

Let us be inspired by the example of the

Holy Maccabees Martyrs,

before a new Antiochus

who asks us to sacrifice to idols

and to abandon the true God.

Let us respond with their words,

praying to the Lord:

“So now, O Sovereign of the heavens,

send a good angel to spread terror and

trembling before us.

By the might of your arm may these

blasphemers

who come against your holy people be

struck down” (2 Mac 15:23).

Let me conclude my talk today with a

personal memory.

When I was Apostolic Nuncio in Nigeria,

I learned about

a magnificent popular tradition that

came out from the terrible war in Biafra,

and which continues to this day.

I personally took part in it, during a

pastoral visit

to the Archdiocese of Onitsha,

and I was very impressed by it.

The tradition — called “Block

Rosary Children” – consists

in gathering thousands of children

(even very young ones) in each village

or neighborhood for the recitation of

the Holy Rosary

to implore peace — each child

holding a little piece of wood, like a

mini-altar,

with an image of Our Lady and a small

candle on it.

In the days leading up to November 3rd,

I invite everyone to join in a Rosary Crusade:

a sort of siege of

Jericho, not with seven trumpets made

of ram’s horns sounded by priests,

but with the Hail Mary’s of the little ones

and the innocent to bring down

the walls of the deep state and

of the deep church.

Let us join with little ones in a

Block Rosary Children,

imploring the Woman clothed with the Sun,

that the Reign of Our Lady and Mother

may be restored, and the eclipse

that afflicts us shortened.

And may God bless these holy intentions.

[Hello H2O]

Here's the transcript (copy/pasted to LibreOffice and from there here):

That was a pretty amazing read. He goes into excruciating detail of how the Church was taken over, naming names along the way. The methods used are the same that are used everywhere, and should be familiar with most here. Good for him for speaking out.

[BHelmet]

I have been following this guy since June - very amazing; heroically outspoken. He has written twice to Trump as well. Two amazing letters. Here is the recent one. This makes the hair stand up on the back of my neck and my eyes bug out a little. As in: things are getting real in a hurry. Just read the first sentence - if that isn't a grabber, I don't know what is. The breadth of this letter is stunning.

Archbishop Vigano’s Open Letter To President Trump – Four Days Before the Vote!

Friday October 30, 2020

Mr. President,
Allow me to address you at this hour in which the fate of the whole world is being threatened by a global conspiracy against God and humanity.
I write to you as an Archbishop, as a Successor of the Apostles, as the former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America.
I am writing to you in the midst of the silence of both civil and religious authorities.
May you accept these words of mine as the “voice of one crying out in the desert” (Jn 1:23).
As I said when I wrote my letter to you in June, this historical moment sees the forces of Evil aligned in a battle without quarter against the forces of Good; forces of Evil that appear powerful and organized as they oppose the children of Light, who are disoriented and disorganized, abandoned by their temporal and spiritual leaders.
Daily we sense the attacks multiplying of those who want to destroy the very basis of society: the natural family, respect for human life, love of country, freedom of education and business.
We see heads of nations and religious leaders pandering to this suicide of Western culture and its Christian soul, while the fundamental rights of citizens and believers are denied in the name of a health emergency that is revealing itself more and more fully as instrumental to the establishment of an inhuman faceless tyranny.
A global plan called theGreat Resetis underway.
Its architect is a global élite that wants to subdue all of humanity, imposing coercive measures with which to drastically limit individual freedoms and those of entire populations.
In several nations this plan has already been approved and financed; in others it is still in an early stage.
Behind the world leaders who are the accomplices and executors of this infernal project, there are unscrupulous characters who finance theWorld Economic Forumand Event 201, promoting their agenda.
The purpose of theGreat Resetis the imposition of a health dictatorship aiming at the imposition of liberticidal measures, hidden behind tempting promises of ensuring a universal income and cancelling individual debt.
The price of these concessions from the International Monetary Fund will be the renunciation of private property and adherence to a program of vaccination against Covid-19 and Covid-21 promoted by Bill Gates with the collaboration of the main pharmaceutical groups.
Beyond the enormous economic interests that motivate the promoters of theGreat Reset, the imposition of the vaccination will be accompanied by the requirement of a health passport and a digital ID, with the consequent contact tracing of the population of the entire world.
Those who do not accept these measures will be confined in detention camps or placed under house arrest, and all their assets will be confiscated.
Mr. President, I imagine that you are already aware that in some countries theGreat Resetwill be activated between the end of this year and the first trimester of 2021.
For this purpose, further lockdowns are planned, which will be officially justified by a supposed second and third wave of the pandemic.
You are well aware of the means that have been deployed to sow panic and legitimize draconian limitations on individual liberties, artfully provoking a world-wide economic crisis.
In the intentions of its architects, this crisis will serve to make the recourse of nations to theGreat Resetirreversible, thereby giving the final blow to a world whose existence and very memory they want to completely cancel.
But this world, Mr. President, includes people, affections, institutions, faith, culture, traditions, and ideals: people and values that do not act like automatons, who do not obey like machines, because they are endowed with a soul and a heart, because they are tied together by a spiritual bond that draws its strength from above, from that God that our adversaries want to challenge, just as Lucifer did at the beginning of time with his “non serviam.” [Note: the Latin words mean “I will not serve,” by which Lucifer meant “I will not serve God.”]
Many people – as we well know – are annoyed by this reference to the clash between Good and Evil and the use of “apocalyptic” overtones, which according to them exasperates spirits and sharpens divisions.
It is not surprising that the enemy is angered at being discovered just when he believes he has reached the citadel he seeks to conquer undisturbed.
What is surprising, however, is that there is no one to sound the alarm.
The reaction of the deep state to those who denounce its plan is broken and incoherent, but understandable.
Just when the complicity of the mainstream media had succeeded in making the transition to the New World Order almost painless and unnoticed, all sorts of deceptions, scandals and crimes are coming to light.
Until a few months ago, it was easy to smear as “conspiracy theorists” those who denounced these terrible plans, which we now see being carried out down to the smallest detail.
No one, up until last February, would ever have thought that, in all of our cities, citizens would be arrested simply for wanting to walk down the street, to breathe, to want to keep their business open, to want to go to church on Sunday.
Yet now it is happening all over the world, even in picture-postcard Italy that many Americans consider to be a small enchanted country, with its ancient monuments, its churches, its charming cities, its characteristic villages.
And while the politicians are barricaded inside their palaces promulgating decrees like Persian satraps, businesses are failing, shops are closing, and people are prevented from living, traveling, working, and praying.
The disastrous psychological consequences of this operation are already being seen, beginning with the suicides of desperate entrepreneurs and of our children, segregated from friends and classmates, told to follow their classes while sitting at home alone in front of a computer.
In Sacred Scripture, Saint Paul speaks to us of “the one who opposes” the manifestation of the mystery of iniquity, thekathèkon(2 Thess 2:6-7).
In the religious sphere, this obstacle to evil is the Church, and in particular the papacy; in the political sphere, it is those who impede the establishment of the New World Order.
As is now clear, the one who occupies the Chair of Peter has betrayed his role from the very beginning in order to defend and promote the globalist ideology, supporting the agenda of the deep church, who chose him from its ranks.
Mr. President, you have clearly stated that you want to defend the nation – One Nation under God, fundamental liberties, and non-negotiable values that are denied and fought against today.
It is you, dear President, who are “the one who opposes” the deep state, the final assault of the children of darkness.
For this reason, it is necessary that all people of good will be persuaded of the epochal importance of the imminent election: not so much for the sake of this or that political program, but because of the general inspiration of your action that best embodies – in this particular historical context – that world, our world, which they want to cancel by means of the lockdown.
Your adversary is also our adversary: it is the Enemy of the human race, He who is “a murderer from the beginning” (Jn 8:44).
Around you are gathered with faith and courage those who consider you the final garrison against the world dictatorship.
另一种选择是投票支持一个人的人ipulated by the deep state, gravely compromised by scandals and corruption, who will do to the United States what Jorge Mario Bergoglio is doing to the Church, Prime Minister Conte to Italy, President Macron to France, Prime Minster Sanchez to Spain, and so on.
The blackmailable nature of Joe Biden – just like that of the prelates of the Vatican’s “magic circle” – will expose him to be used unscrupulously, allowing illegitimate powers to interfere in both domestic politics as well as international balances.
很明显,那些操纵他already have someone worse than him ready, with whom they will replace him as soon as the opportunity arises.
And yet, in the midst of this bleak picture, this apparently unstoppable advance of the “Invisible Enemy,” an element of hope emerges.
The adversary does not know how to love, and it does not understand that it is not enough to assure a universal income or to cancel mortgages in order to subjugate the masses and convince them to be branded like cattle.
This people, which for too long has endured the abuses of a hateful and tyrannical power, is rediscovering that it has a soul; it is understanding that it is not willing to exchange its freedom for the homogenization and cancellation of its identity; it is beginning to understand the value of familial and social ties, of the bonds of faith and culture that unite honest people.
This Great Reset is destined to fail because those who planned it do not understand that there are still people ready to take to the streets to defend their rights, to protect their loved ones, to give a future to their children and grandchildren.
The leveling inhumanity of the globalist project will shatter miserably in the face of the firm and courageous opposition of the children of Light.
The enemy has Satan on its side, He who only knows how to hate.
But on our side, we have the Lord Almighty, the God of armies arrayed for battle, and the Most Holy Virgin, who will crush the head of the ancient Serpent. “If God is for us, who can be against us?” (Rom 8:31).
Mr. President, you are well aware that, in this crucial hour, the United States of America is considered the defending wall against which the war declared by the advocates of globalism has been unleashed.
Place your trust in the Lord, strengthened by the words of the Apostle Paul: “I can do all things in Him who strengthens me” (Phil 4:13).
是一个乐器是一个神圣的天意great responsibility, for which you will certainly receive all the graces of state that you need, since they are being fervently implored for you by the many people who support you with their prayers.
With this heavenly hope and the assurance of my prayer for you, for the First Lady, and for your collaborators, with all my heart I send you my blessing.
God bless the United States of America!
+ Carlo Maria Viganò
Tit. Archbishop of Ulpiana
Former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America
Official translation

[BHelmet]

One extraordinary thing is that he is calling Pope Francis a Judas! Astounding! And it is SO well written and organized.

[drygol]

Thank you everyone for the feedback. I wasn't familiar with this archbishop either and I was super surprised that he is speaking it out loud at this very moment.

[Persephone]

The letter translated into French :

Vigano: lettre ouverte au Président des Etats-Unis | Benoit et Moi

Monsieur le Président,

permettez-moi de m’adresser à vous, en cette heure où le sort du monde entier est menacé par une conspiration mondiale contre Dieu et l’humanité. Je vous écris en tant qu’archevêque, en tant que successeur des apôtres, en tant qu’ancien nonce apostolique aux États-Unis d’Amérique. Je vous écris dans le silence des autorités civiles et religieuses: puissiez-vous accueillir mes paroles comme la « voix de celui qui crie dans le désert » (Jn 1, 23).

Comme j’ai eu l’occasion de vous l’écrire dans maLettre en juin dernier, ce moment historique voit les forces du Mal déployées dans une bataille sans merci contre les forces du Bien; des forces du Mal qui semblent puissantes et organisées face aux enfants de la Lumière, désorientés et désorganisés, abandonnés par leurs chefs temporels et spirituels.

Nous entendons se multiplier les attaques de ceux qui veulent démolir les fondements mêmes de la société: la famille naturelle, le respect de la vie humaine, l’amour de la patrie, la liberté d’éducation et d’entreprise.Nous voyons les dirigeants des nations et les chefs religieux soutenir ce suicide de la culture occidentale et de son âme chrétienne, tandis que les citoyens et les croyants sont privés de leurs droits fondamentaux, au nom d’une urgence sanitaire qui se révèle de plus en plus une instrumentalisation pour l’instauration d’une tyrannie inhumaine sans visage.

Un plan global, appeléGreat Reset,美国东部时间voie de认识。Les工匠en是une élite qui veut soumettre l’ensemble de l’humanité, en imposant des mesures coercitives qui limitent drastiquement les libertés des personnes et des peuples. Dans certains pays, ce projet a déjà été approuvé et financé ; dans d’autres, il en est encore à ses débuts. Derrière les dirigeants mondiaux, les complices et les exécutants de ce projet infernal, il y a des gens sans scrupules qui financent leWorld Economic Forumet l’Event 201[ndt: exercice de simulation de pandémie, mené en partenariat avec la Fondation Bill et Melinda Gates et le Forum économique mondial, qui a eu lieu en octobre 2019,Source] , en faisant la promotion de son programme.

Le but duGreat Resetest l’imposition d’une dictature sanitaire visant à imposer des mesures liberticides, cachées derrière des promesses attrayantes d’assurer un revenu universel et d’annuler la dette des individus. Le prix de ces concessions du Fonds monétaire international devrait être la renonciation à la propriété privée et l’adhésion à un programme de vaccination contre les infections Covid-19 et Covid-21 promu par Bill Gates avec la collaboration de grands groupes pharmaceutiques. Au-delà des énormes intérêts économiques qui animent les promoteurs duGreat Reset, l’imposition de la vaccination sera accompagnée de l’obligation d’un passeport sanitaire et d’une carte d’identité numérique, avec pour conséquence le suivi des contacts de toute la population mondiale. Toute personne qui n’accepte pas de se soumettre à ces mesures sera confinée dans des camps de détention ou assignée à résidence, et tous ses biens seront confisqués.

Monsieur le Président, j’imagine que cette nouvelle vous est déjà connue : dans certains pays, leGreat Resetdevrait être activé entre la fin de cette année et le premier trimestre de 2021.À cette fin, d’autres mesures de confinement sont prévues, officiellement justifiées par une deuxième et une troisième vague présumées de la pandémie. Vous savez quels moyens ont été déployés pour semer la panique et légitimer des restrictions draconiennes des libertés individuelles, provoquant habilement une crise économique mondiale. Dans les intentions de ses créateurs, cette crise sert à rendre irréversible le recours des États auGreat Reset, donnant le coup de grâce à un monde dont on veut effacer complètement l’existence et la mémoire. Mais ce monde, Monsieur le Président, porte avec lui personnes, affections, institutions, foi, culture, traditions, idéaux : des personnes et des valeurs qui n’agissent pas comme des automates, qui n’obéissent pas comme des machines, parce qu’elles ont une âme et un cœur, parce qu’elles sont liées entre elles par un lien spirituel qui tire sa force d’en haut, de ce Dieu que nos adversaires veulent défier, comme Lucifer l’a fait au début des temps avec son «non serviam« .

Beaucoup – nous le savons bien – considèrent avec agacement cet appel au choc entre le Bien et le Mal, l’utilisation de tons « apocalyptiques », qui selon eux exaspèrent les âmes et aiguisent les divisions. Il n’est pas surprenant que l’ennemi se sente découvert au moment même où il croit avoir atteint sans être dérangé la citadelle à conquérir.Il est toutefois surprenant qu’il n’y ait personne pour tirer la sonnette d’alarme. La réaction duDeep Stateà ceux qui dénoncent son plan est incohérente, mais compréhensible. Juste au moment où la complicité des médiasmainstreama réussi à rendre la transition vers le nouvel ordre mondial presque indolore et inaperçue, des tromperies, des scandales et des crimes sont mis au jour.

Jusqu’à il y a quelques mois, il était facile de réduire au rang de « conspirationnistes » ceux qui dénonçaient ces terribles plans, que nous voyons maintenant réalisés dans les moindres détails. Personne, jusqu’en février dernier, n’aurait jamais pensé qu’on en viendrait, dans toutes nos villes, à arrêter des citoyens pour le seul fait de vouloir marcher dans la rue, de respirer, de vouloir garder son négoce ouvert, d’aller à la messe le dimanche.Pourtant, cela se passe partout dans le monde, même dans cette Italie de carte postale que beaucoup d’Américains considèrent comme un petit pays enchanté, avec ses monuments anciens, ses églises, ses villes enchanteresses, ses villages caractéristiques. Et tandis que les politiciens sont barricadés dans leurs palais pour promulguer des décrets comme les satrapes persans, les activités font faillite, les magasins ferment, les gens sont empêchés de vivre, de se déplacer, de travailler, de prier. Les conséquences psychologiques désastreuses de cette opération sont déjà visibles, à commencer par les suicides d’entrepreneurs désespérés, et par nos enfants, séparés de leurs amis et de leurs camarades pour suivre leurs cours devant un ordinateur.

Dans l’Écriture Sainte, saint Paul nous parle de « celui qui s’oppose » à la manifestation du mystère d’iniquité, lekathèkon(2Th 2,6-7). Dans le domaine religieux, cet obstacle est l’Église et en particulier la papauté; dans le domaine politique, c’est lui qui empêche l’établissement du Nouvel Ordre Mondial.

Comme c’est désormais évident,celui qui occupe le siège de Pierre a, dès le début, trahi son propre rôle, pour défendre et promouvoir l’idéologie mondialiste, en suivant l’agenda de laDeep Church, qui l’a choisi dans son sein.

Monsieur le Président, vous avez clairement déclaré que vous vouliez défendre la nation –One Nation under God-, les libertés fondamentales, les valeurs non négociables qui sont niées et combattues aujourd’hui. C’est vous, cher Président, « celui qui s’oppose » auDeep State, à l’assaut final des enfants des ténèbres.

C’est pourquoi toutes les personnes de bonne volonté doivent être persuadées de l’importance capitale des prochaines élections : non pas tant à cause de tel ou tel point du programme politique, mais plutôt parce quec’est l’inspiration générale de votre action qui incarne le mieux – dans ce contexte historique particulier – ce monde, notre monde, que l’on voudrait effacer par lelockdown.Votre adversaire est aussi le nôtre: il est l’Ennemi de l’humanité, celui qui est « meurtrier dès le commencement » (Jn 8, 44).

Autour de vous se rassemblent avec confiance et courage ceux qui vous considèrent comme l’ultime garnison contre la dictature mondiale. L’alternative est de voter pour un personnage manipulé par leDeep State, gravement compromis dans les scandales et la corruption, qui fera aux États-Unis ce que Jorge Mario Bergoglio fait à l’Église, le Premier ministre Conte à l’Italie, le président Macron à la France, le Premier ministre Sanchez à l’Espagne, etc. La possibilité de faire chanter Joe Biden – comme les prélats du « cercle magique » vatican – permettra de l’utiliser sans scrupules, consentant à des pouvoirs illégitimes de s’immiscer dans la politique intérieure et les équilibres internationaux. Il est clair que ceux qui le manœuvrent ont déjà quelqu’un de pire que lui prêt à le remplacer dès que l’occasion se présente.

Pourtant, dans ce tableau désolant, dans cette avancée apparemment inexorable de « l’Ennemi invisible », un élément d’espoir émerge. L’adversaire ne sait pas aimer, et ne comprend pas qu’il ne suffit pas d’assurer un revenu universel ou d’annuler les hypothèques pour assujettir les masses et les convaincre de se faire marquer comme du bétail. Ce peuple, qui a trop longtemps subi les abus d’un pouvoir haineux et tyrannique, redécouvre qu’il a une âme; il comprend qu’il n’est pas disposé à troquer sa liberté contre l’uniformisation et l’effacement de son identité; il commence à comprendre la valeur des liens familiaux et sociaux, des liens de foi et de culture qui unissent les honnêtes gens. CeGreat Resetest voué à l’échec parce que ceux qui l’ont planifié ne comprennent pas qu’il y a encore des gens qui sont prêts à descendre dans la rue pour défendre leurs droits, protéger leurs proches, donner un avenir à leurs enfants. L’inhumanité nivelante du projet mondialiste sera misérablement brisée face à l’opposition ferme et courageuse des enfants de la Lumière. L’ennemi a Satan à ses côtés, qui ne sait que haïr. Nous avons à nos côtés le Seigneur tout-puissant, le Dieu des armées déployées dans la bataille, et la Très Sainte Vierge, qui écrasera la tête de l’ancien Serpent. « Si Dieu est pour nous, qui sera contre nous ? » (Rm 8, 31).

Monsieur le Président, vous savez parfaitement combien les États-Unis d’Amérique, en cette heure cruciale, sont considérés comme le rempart contre lequel s’est déchaînée la guerre déclarée par les partisans du mondialisme. Mettez votre confiance dans le Seigneur, renforcé par les paroles de l’Apôtre : « Je peux tout en celui qui me donne la force » (Ph 4, 13).Être un instrument de la divine Providence est une grande responsabilité, à laquelle correspondront certainement les grâces d’état nécessaires, ardemment implorées par les nombreux qui vous soutiennent par leurs prières.

Avec ce souhait céleste et l’assurance de ma prière pour vous, pour la Première Dame et pour vos collaborateurs, de tout cœur je vous adresse ma bénédiction

God bless the United States of America!

Carlo Maria Viganò
Archevêque d’Upiana
ex-nonce apostolique aux Etats-Unis d’Amérique

[Lys]

Wow ! This letter is just absolutely outstanding, thank you all for sharing it.
It feels like there is hope and I think we all need it.
It is moving.
I had never heard of Carlo Maria Viganò beforethis videowhere Alexis Cossette is saying that the General Flynn repeats his words on Twitter.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322147673739272192

I just made the link as I had put the video on my "to watch later" list but I think I am going to watch it now.

[Tuatha de Danaan]

Here's the transcript (copy/pasted to LibreOffice and from there he

anka, thank you very much for finding this transcript. Greatly appreciated.