Hello all,
Please excuse me if a thread exists for this already. So... The Russian strikes in Syria :
http://www.rt.com/news/317101-russia-isis-strikes-intelligence/
I have been having to learn about strategy as a part of my current career change, which has only increased my admiration for Putin and his advisers. A fundamental part of a plan that can be called a strategy is a long-term vision. I am quite convinced that the US foreign policy lacks exactly that. It probably is a vast logistical structure of great complexity and sophistication, but it seems to be largely tactical in nature. Its short-term vision has never been revised since the Cold War (not even speaking of the erroneous nature of the assumptions that would have created this structure). Anyone who has read Prouty should have a good sense of this structure.
Russia under its current leadership seems to have a long-term goal, and that goal seems to be transparent, which is the freedom to practice freely international relations and trade while preserving national sovereignty. I mention all of this because I think Russia's actions are chosen as being coherent with their strategy. They have chosen this time to be the proper moment to make such an important decision. They are acting within the official narrative of ISIS as rogue, fundamentalist state even though it is the worst kept secret in the world that it is an American, ABC agency-sponsored organization.
Obviously, another great war benefits no one except profiteers, and I think Putin and his strategists understand this. So... What makes this time so right to challenge the official narrative? Or should I say to act within the official narrative to bring about unofficial change?
I am asking this question literally because I have no idea why myself. I felt that Russia would eventually draw some sort of line, but I am honestly at a loss to even begin to explain why now is the moment. That is probably because of a lack of information.
Best wishes.