Amazing session folks, which has been a step by step over these many years - and as for your comment, Laura:
…换句话说,那一群人t kind of faith that in the face of everything being literally awful as it is in our world today, that they still have faith in the other reality, they still have faith in doing good, doing right, being loving, that they do not buy into the whole Darwinian materialistic thing,
and basically they don’t believe those liesand by those means they are able to, at a certain point in time that Paul called the culmination of the ages, be restored to this Edenic state... in other words
a 4D STO reality. Am I interpreting that correctly?
Yes, it was beautiful indeed, distilling down into what the C's once said, simple truths.
Sure, then Israel would be 'wiped out' in retaliation, but which responsible leader willingly sacrifices 10 or 20 or 30 percent of his population for some 'great cause'? Yes, Iranian ideology is all about 'defeating the Zionist entity in Holy War', and the specific military branch Soleimani was in charge of - the Quds Force - is specifically ideologically oriented towards 'liberating Jerusalem from the Jewish Crusaders', but that's ideology.Behind the scenes, rather more pragmatic decision-making takes place, both within the Iranian elite, and in concert with the elites of other countries,
who all recognize that what it comes down to in the end is economics, trade and long-term stability (not least to maintain their own positions in power!).
Couple of SOTT article
here("
Islamic State terrorists rejoiced at the death of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani at the hands of his American 'allies,'"),
here("
大规模人群的悼念者公顷ve gathered for a farewell procession dedicated to Quds Force commander Major General Qassem Soleimani") and
here("
Mossad chief Yossi Cohen said a potential Israeli assassination of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani...was "not impossible.'")
One might add that perhaps as much is it promotes long-term stability for the elite, it promotes just enough instability without blowing each other up that keeps the manufactured head-choppers like IS in the game, the American's in Iraq (or NATO as Trump might want to realize if he removes American forces), the wolves at Assad's door, a wedge against Putin; Turkey is troublesome, too, and this all benefits the world of Mossad who have long term goals in the region that relies on helping foster this chaos and reshaping the geopolitical and religious landscape. Soleimani might be seen as being part of this undoing, and that made people very nervous, however he might have accelerated what can't be accelerated in terms of an all out conflagration - so agreements were made.
Soleimani was also said to be recruiting Afghan youth (from within Iran), and this may have had ramifications on the Taliban leaders and the deals being made in Afghanistan. There was also the question of his misdirecting military and financial assets that was needed in-country for sustaining purposes rather than outside. However, outside Soleimani was a thorn in the side of the masters of chaos - cleaning out their IS assets and strengthening the field. As was said, this was also a threat to the internal Iranian elite who would face Israel in different ways, and Israel had wanted Soleimani gone for a long time and had applied pressure.
Noticed more recently that there are new Pro-Assad
campaignsin places, such as in Italy with Soleimani billboards being erected. His memory is not going away anytime soon.
Concerning the portal over Iraq. Yes, that was very interesting.
From above quote: "If you think back over the history of the Earth, you will realize
how many dramas of religion and civilization have been introduced in that portal"
"Dramas of religion" indeed - from pillars of smoke and the law, to Mecca and beyond that would eventually shape global religion of various kinds.
Of the portal was the added comment "Are they fought over?" This seems to be the case, tipping to the STS side in history.
Although my opinion on Jordan Peterson’s work is quite high, I do have my own questions about it. but I would like to ask, as the group seemed pretty confident that there was a particular mistake that he made.Can some one tell us what that was?
Can't speak for others, yet it appeared to me that JP seemed to have an infallible sense of himself as it relates to these drugs, one of complete understanding and buy-in, down to the very workings of the mind's complicated chemistry. He had prescribed them and was a user of them, and he could not think of himself not being in control.
This is his big lesson that almost did him in, osit.
I'm not sure how he feels about it, and he will likely have words at some point.