But notice the exact statement: "It originated when sexuality did."
That does not mean exactly what you have inferred from it. The more likely meaning is that as soon as sexual reproduction began, i.e. when the prototypes were set running, homosexuality rapidly appeared.
Was that a result of mutations? Probably some.
Was that a result of STS manipulation? Probably a lot.
And the two answers are not mutually exclusive.
And yes, the articles do suggest that the genetic link is not as strong as some would like it to be and that puts possibly more weight on the STS manipulation side of things.
I don't know about you, but once I learned about STS manipulations etc, it really p*ssed me off. What kind of person would enjoy being a puppet?
谢谢你的想法关于引用劳拉。I don't want to be a puppet, whatever the extent to which my sexuality or expressions thereof are a result of aforementioned manipulations. As for anger at the STS, I can understand that. For philosophical reasons I can't seem to bring myself to be angry at them, since everything I experience is a choice of mine on some level -- either that of day-to-day decision-making, deeper level PSI and pre-incarnational life planning, or just part of the legacy with the primordial human soul group experimenting with matter and consorting with the snake in the garden and "losing our light". So my attitude is, I don't think I could have been "manipulated" into being gay unless I was on some level choosing that as a learning opportunity of some kind. That's the only empowering position I can find.