Ominous said:
I didn't think the family had any reason to lie about the matter, and I was genuinely curious. And this part of the forum is about the dead and undead. That is not reality? I agologize for voicing my curiosity here...you have made me feel it was frivolous of me to do so. I seem to stub my toe every so often in this forum.
Hi Ominous, I don't think SAO meant that the family was lying ( though he might have and I could be wrong ) - I think he was simply saying that just because the 'psychic' involved said that certain things were happening does not mean that certain things were happening and that asking about the plausibility of such things is rather a difficult thing to address on any level.
Ultimately - while the family was likely recounting what happened to them from their perspective (assuming it wasn't all theatre for television) the psychic could be making up what 'they see' - or they could think they are genuine and it is their imagination, or they could be really 'seeing something' - we cannot know. So, the number of variables in the equation gets so high that to work through it all would be like 'mucking out the Aegean stables' as someone around here is fond of saying.
As far as what can and cannot happen once one leaves 'this mortal coil' - what we work with here are simply hypotheses and while the 'conduit' from '3D' to '5D' is 'supposed' to be incorruptible, who's to say where and when choice comes into play?
So - long story short - I'm genuinely curious as well, however, with this many variables and with the fact that this was on the discovery channel - well - we're looking at never really having a good grasp on any of it - and I think that may be where SAO was coming from. Personally, I find it hard to fathom that some child abusing Mormon could control the souls of the children he abused - but then again, I'm kind of an optimist that way. ;)
a