'One of the REAL issue is US' oil smuggling in Syria... Did you discuss about this REAL issue?...'
Q: (Ark) I would like to know if it is at all relevant, because a lot of things happen that are irrelevant for the future?
A: It is. [break for New Year's]
Q: It is now 1998. Do you guys have any predictions or comments for the new year?
A: In Pensacola, for but one example, it is still only 1997.
问:很可爱!好的,所以这不是新年the entire globe, and you have made your point about time. However, soon, everyone will agree that it is 1998, and then it will be, in fact, 1998. So, do you have, for those waiting with baited breath, anything to say about the upcoming year. Of course, I know all the psychics and channels are busily posting all their direful predictions about photon belts, null zones and whatever... a whole new series of dates for this will come, I expect...
A: Are you not yet tiring of such drivel?
Q: Yes, I am extremely tired of such drivel, but you have given some very good predictions in the past, and some that were dead wrong. And, speaking of dead wrong predictions, let me ask: on one occasion you said that the number of people left alive after the flood of Noah was 19 million and on another occasion you said 119 million. Now which is the correct figure?
A: Either.
问:好吧,这不可能!
A: Yes it can... all is as the perceiver perceives.
Q: I think I liked you better when you were a little more linear!
A: We never were. As that is not for you. Not any more than it is for the company executive to don diapers!
Q: Yes, but... I feel like we are going around in circles and we get vague answers. Yes, we understand the necessity for such answers in some cases, but there are other things going on that we would like to deal with in a little more direct manner.
A: You get into trouble when you presuppose the nature of the answers to the questions.
I believe Donald Trump Jr. has already publicly mused, some time ago, about running for president, to be considered when his children are older. Then, there are also articles like this:Trump Jr being groomed to run for president as family seeks a White House ‘dynasty’: reportThere is something that went through my mind on several occasions that I think hasn't been mentioned before. It seems to me that Trump could very well be not the first and last Trump that runs for president. He could be the first in a dynasty of Trumps attempting the highest office in the US.
In an interview with theTimes of London, Eric Trump said that although he has no political ambitions himself, he believes his older brother does.
When asked if there could be a Trump family dynasty, Eric replied, “Oh sure.”
In 2018,The Guardianreported thatTrump Jr. had not only become a skilled fundraiserfor his father’s reelection campaign — he also has been regularly called upon by supporters to run for president himself.
...“Deals cut in the dead of night,” Cruz asserted in a Twitter video message this week that summarized some of the provisions in the spending package:
The senator said the spending dealbenefits the “lobbyists who are bankrupting this country,” andtoldCBS 11it represents “lobbyists’ Christmas present.”
“While you were with your family, shopping for Christmas, the lobbyists were spending and spending,” Cruz said in his video message.
“Nobody’s read it,” Cruz said as he puffed on a cigar. “There isn’t a person alive who has read this piece of garbage.”
Cruz called out some of the items in the bill that were included没有辩论和一个独立的投票. He noted, for example, the spending deal “extends the Export-Import Bank for seven years.”
The bank, which provides loans to promote the foreign purchases of U.S. goods, is “one of the greatest corporate boondoggles – corporate welfare,” the senator asserted.
The massive spending bill also raises the tobacco purchasing age to 21.
Cruz ridiculed this provision,citing that soldiers can be drafted at age 18, but “God help you if you want to have a smoke.”
The senator pointed out the spending bill also “funds government research on gun control.”
“Can’t you wait for the report from the Centers for Disease Control … bogus studies that are going to be used to take away your constitutional rights,” Cruz stated.
The senator added that the spending bill:
While a pro-abortion rights amendmentproposedby New Hampshire Democrat Jeanne Shaheen – one that would have undermined Trump’s pro-life policies overseas – was notincludedin the final spending package, America’s largest abortion business, Planned Parenthood,remains funded by taxpayers.– continues tax breaks for “so-called” renewable energy
– fails to stop sanctuary cities
– fails to defund Planned Parenthood and fails to end Obamacare
Pro-life organization Live Actionobservedthat, since the spending deal fails to end Obamacare, its sex education program, known as PREP, will still receive $75 million, and $3 million of the PREP funding will go to Planned Parenthood.
Live Action added:
“This pile of trash belongs in an ashtray,” Cruz said in his video message.Additionally, Planned Parenthood will continue to receive millions more through [Medicaid] reimbursements and discretionary funds. In their 2017 Annual Report, Planned Parenthood indicatedthat34%of their revenue came from “Government Health Services Reimbursements & Grants.”
Congressional spending packages for FY2020 don’t include any provisions to further curb the millions of taxpayer dollars going to America’s abortion giant.
On Thursday, the senatorreleaseda statement after voting against the bill.
“With a $23 trillion national debt,this 2,313-page spending package that Congressional leaders unveiled just days ago represents everything Americans hate about Washington,” Cruz said, adding:
“This ridiculous, rushed, end-of-year spending process, year after year, is an example of government of the lobbyists, by the lobbyists, and for the lobbyists,” he said.Though there are several good provisions included in the final bills that I was proud to fight for, including a well-deserved pay raise for our men and women in uniform and additional support for our Armed Forces and veterans, this $1.4 trillion spending monstrosity plunges our nation even further into debt – haphazardly spending taxpayer dollarson the priorities of lobbyists and Democrats at the expense of the priorities of the American people, from funding Planned Parenthood, sanctuary cities, and Obamacare, to raising the tobacco purchasing age to 21.
On Saturday, the state media said the United States would “pay dearly” for taking issue with the North’s human rights record and said Washington’s “malicious words” would only aggravate tensions on the Korean Peninsula.
North Korea has also repeatedly called for the United States to drop its “hostile policy” and warned about its “Christmas gift” as the end-year deadline it set for Washington to change its position looms.
Some experts say the reclusive state may be preparing for an intercontinental ballistic missile test that could put it back on a path of confrontation with the United States.
The U.S. envoy for North Korea, Stephen Biegun, has visited South Korea and China in the past week, issuing a public and direct call to North Korea to return to the negotiating table, but there has been no response.
The defense budget stands at $738 billion, which is 3.1% more than in the 2019 fiscal year ($716 billion). Around $635 billion is allocated to the Pentagon, and $71.5 to continuing military operations in Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen and to fighting against terrorism in other countires. A total of $31.5 billion is allocated for maintaining the combat capabilities of the nuclear weapons and their modernization through the US Department of Energy, and for other defense purposes.
Military aid to Ukraine will stand at $300 million, which is $50 million more than in 2019.
The defense budget plan also envisages introducting sanctions against Russia over the Nord Stream 2 and Turkish Stream gas pipeline projects, as well as restrictions in the framework of the CAESAR Syria Civilian Protection Act.
The embargo for direct cooperation with Moscow in the military sphere has once again been extended,and the US government is advised against recognizing Crimea's status as part of Russia.
Only in a country that produces so much fake news at the official level, could there be afake impeachment proceduremade purely for media consumption, with no real or tangible possible victory in sight.
Nancy Pelosi is evidently extraordinarily cynical. Her politics appears to be‘they deserve whatever they believe’. And her aim appears to be the one who makes them believe things so that they deserve what she gives them.
Imagine being a fly on the wall of the meeting with Pelosi where it was decided to go forward with impeachment in the House of Representatives, despite not having either sufficient traction in the Senate or any way to control the process that the Senate uses.
It probably went like this: ‘We’ll say we impeached him, because we did, and we’ll say he was impeached. We’ll declare victory, and go home. This will make him unelectable because of the stigma of impeachment.‘