@bjorn, do you know why he’s insisting on failing rocket launches?
I don't know. Does he?
@bjorn, do you know why he’s insisting on failing rocket launches?
Why on earth (see what I did there) would E Musk buy the ISS? As far as "insisting" on failing rocket launches, he is actually "allowing" for early failure. His whole development model is 1) build something 2) try it 3) observe specifically why it fails to meet the objective 4) implement a fix 5) go back to 1).Musk must build his own space station in orbit and then build a yard for space ships.@bjorn, do you know why he’s insisting on failing rocket launches? Can he not buy the ISS and refurbish it?
In a video, he was mentioning that he looks at new ways of improving ‘objects’ by using the first principles of manufacturing while preserving the function. This rocket / starship (?) reflects rather the reinvention of the rocket and its landing method.I don't know. Does he?
Can he not buy the ISS and refurbish it?
Why not buy and repurpose the ISS at least as coordinating space ‘offices’ for the shipyard.Why on earth (see what I did there) would E Musk buy the ISS? As far as "insisting" on failing rocket launches, he is actually "allowing" for early failure. His whole development model is 1) build something 2) try it 3) observe specifically why it fails to meet the objective 4) implement a fix 5) go back to 1).
It is actually brilliant and a radical departure from the approach NASA has taken where "failure is not an option". This results in tremendous over-design or at least not a focus on what truly matters. NASA requires caution. Musk is taking the position that "Failure where youdo not learn anythingis not an option." SpaceX only is overly cautious when a human being is actually involved.
In a video, he was mentioning that he looks at new ways of improving ‘objects’ by using the first principles of manufacturing while preserving the function. This rocket / starship (?) reflects rather the reinvention of the rocket and its landing method.
Why not buy and repurpose the ISS at least as coordinating space offices for the shipyard.
Ok, that is probably easy to conceptualize but more difficult to realize. Gravity and all other natural elements complicate the math to extremes when the design rests on minimalistic engines and minimal fuel.飞船不是为了土地像他以前的罗依ckets. It's meant to touch the ground by a so called belly flop maneuver. See here:
Ok, that is probably easy to conceptualize but more difficult to realize. Gravity and all other natural elements complicate the math to extremes when the design rests on minimal engines and fuel.
Roly-poly toy - WikipediaOk, that is probably easy to conceptualize but more difficult to realize. Gravity and all other natural elements complicate the math to extremes when the design rests on minimalistic engines and minimal fuel.
@bjorn, I must be psychic.Check out this article.Musk his spaceship is big. And the ISS doesn't has a garage that size. Besides, the ISS is a research station. Not a shipyard.
Repairs can be done on the ground on Earth, easier and cheaper.
Elon Musk aims to make dogecoin a recognized currency. Get there early.